Review the case brief
Read the fictional case and separate the decision from the surrounding story.
Investigate. Verify. Decide.
An AI-assisted investigation where teams analyse fictional evidence, challenge AI outputs and identify the most defensible conclusion.
Teams receive a fictional case containing documents, clues and conflicting information. AI can accelerate analysis—but teams must verify before accepting a conclusion.
Agree the mission rules and success criteria during the briefing, then let your team choose its approach.
A practical progression from the first decision to the final demonstration.
Read the fictional case and separate the decision from the surrounding story.
Build a timeline, record sources and mark contradictory statements.
Ask the approved AI tool to suggest patterns and competing explanations.
Trace important claims back to the evidence pack and flag unsupported answers.
Present a conclusion with supporting evidence, uncertainty and remaining questions.
Compare competing explanations instead of accepting the first plausible answer.
Trace AI-generated statements to the original case evidence.
Separate confidence in an answer from the strength of its support.
Combine individual findings into a shared, defensible conclusion.
The experience directly addresses a modern workplace skill: knowing when AI is useful, when it is uncertain and when human verification must take over.
Plan AI Detective around your participants, the available time and the decisions you want them to practise.
Group sizes and timings are planning guides. Equipment, technical depth and venue suitability are confirmed in the proposal.
Planning details for AI Detective. Bring any additional requirements into your conversation with Sieger.
No. The recommended format uses fictional scenarios and synthetic evidence.
The challenge can compare AI-assisted and human-only investigation approaches.
Yes. Difficulty, narrative, scoring, team size, duration, venue layout and the workplace behaviour being explored can all be customised.
Yes. The experience can be combined with electronics, drones, robotics, STEM, software, AI and mechanical challenges to create a larger technology challenge journey.
The current planning format is 20–100 participants, organised into teams of 4–6. Confirm the final group size with Sieger so equipment, facilitator coverage and team rotations can be planned.
The indicative activity duration is 75 min. Briefing, practice, team presentations and debrief requirements can affect the final agenda; agree the complete session timing during planning.
The proposed kit includes Fictional evidence pack, Case board, Approved AI tool, Investigation prompts, and Evaluation rubric. Confirm the final equipment list, participant devices and venue requirements with the programme team.
The existing format is designed with leadership teams, risk teams, analytical teams, ai adoption programs in mind. Share participants’ experience levels so the technical depth and facilitation can be matched to the group.
The facilitator can use the agreed challenge rules, team decisions and observed results to guide the debrief. The discussion connects critical thinking, verification, judgement to situations your team encounters at work.
Send your preferred date, location, participant count and learning objective through the enquiry form or call +91 98400 97567. Sieger can discuss the suitable format, equipment, venue needs and proposal.
Tell us what you have in mind. We will help you explore a programme that fits your people and your occasion.
Still finalising the details? Share what you know.
Every team is different. Share your people, purpose and preferred setting, and we’ll translate your brief into an experience designed to connect, engage and create lasting impact.
Share your brief and preferred contact details.
Choose an experience that connects your people, your purpose and the possibilities of technology.